Professional Work Period, Variety of Work Experience, Managerial Competence, Technical
Competence, Educational Level, Performance Assessment Results, and Level of Punishment
that has been received.
After the criteria and their level of importance are determined, the preference weight (W)
for each employee is calculated based on the level of importance of the criteria given. A
weighted normalized decision matrix is also created using a predetermined formula.
Furthermore, the calculation of the Positive Ideal Solution (Y Max) and Negative Ideal
Solution (Y Min) is carried out to determine the preference value of each alternative. The
calculation results show that the highest preference value is for Employee 5 (Alternative A5),
with a preference value of 0.80.
Based on the preference value, it can be concluded that Employee 5 is the best alternative
that has the highest value in employee performance assessment to be placed as a class A garden
manager.
REFERENCES
Aqli, I., Ratnawati, D. E., & Data, M. (2016). Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Sekolah
Menengah Atas Sederajat Kota Malang Menggunakan Metode AHP ELECTRE Dan
TOPSIS. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) p-ISSN, 2355, 7699.
Asrul, B. E. W., & Zuhriyah, S. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pendistribusian Air
Bersih Menggunakan Mobil Tangki pada PDAM Kota Makassar dengan Menggunakan
Metode TOPSIS. J. Teknol. Inf. Dan Ilmu Komput, 8(1), 35.
Chams, N., & García-Blandón, J. (2019). On the importance of sustainable human resource
management for the adoption of sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation
and Recycling, 141, 109–122.
Dobrosavljević, A., & Urošević, S. (2022). Research of the influence of CSR dimensions
integration in business processes on the reduction of employee turnover in apparel
industry organizations using AHP and TOPSIS methods. Engineering Management
Journal, 34(3), 394–405.
Forcina, A., Silvestri, L., De Felice, F., & Falcone, D. (2024). Exploring Industry 4.0
technologies to improve manufacturing enterprise safety management: A TOPSIS-based
decision support system and real case study. Safety Science, 169, 106351.
Guswandi, D., Yanto, M., Hafizh, M., & Mayola, L. (2021). Analisis hybrid decision support
system dalam penentuan status kelulusan mahasiswa. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem
Dan Teknologi Informasi), 5(6), 1127–1136.
Jin, L., Liu, P., Yao, W., Wei, J., & Li, Z. (2024). Safety assessment of existing subgrade
retaining wall based on a combined Weighting-TOPSIS evaluation method. Developments
in the Built Environment, 18, 100420.
Masum, A. K. M., Karim, A., Al Abid, F. Bin, Islam, S., & Anas, M. (2019). A new hybrid
AHP-topsis method for ranking human capital indicators by normalized decision matrix.
J. Comput. Sci, 15(12), 1746–1751.
Park, C.-J., Kim, S.-Y., & Nguyen, M. V. (2021). Fuzzy TOPSIS application to rank
determinants of employee retention in construction companies: South Korean case.
Sustainability, 13(11), 5787.
Pramudita, A. N., & Rizaldi, T. (2018). Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan SAW dalam
Penempatan Karyawan. SEMNASKIT 2015.
Republik, M. B. U. M. N. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Republik