arises because government institutions are generally always in the form of bureaucracy.
Currently, bureaucratic reform has become a demand of the public who expect that the
apparatus and bureaucracy in the body of government agencies can be of better quality. There
are several things behind the need for bureaucratic reform in government institutions, in
particular, including the practice of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (KKN) which is still
ongoing today, the level of public services that have not met expectations, the level of
efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity that has not been optimal from the government
bureaucracy, the level of transparency and accountability of government bureaucracy is still
low, and the level of discipline and work ethic of employees who are still ongoing low (Kadir,
2018). Therefore, it is hoped that this bureaucratic reform program can be carried out by
structuring various government administration systems so that it is expected to bring changes
to government performance. In addition, it is expected to realize a professional government
bureaucracy with the characteristics of being able to serve the public, dedicated, high
performing, integrated, free and clean from KKN (Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism),
prosperous, neutral, and upholding the basic values and code of ethics of the state apparatus.
One of the long-term goals of bureaucratic reform is to become a world-class government
where in 2025 it is expected to produce quality governance by achieving bureaucratic reform
goals gradually. The better the quality of governance, the better the development results
characterized by the absence of corruption and violations, all programs and permits are
completed properly and quickly, there is good communication with the public, the use of
effective and productive time (working hours), the application of punishment and rewards that
are carried out consistently and continuously, and the existence of tangible development
results(Nurdin, 2019). However, until now the implementation process of the bureaucratic
reform idea has not shown significant development.
Improvement of national policies in the field of apparatus will encourage the creation of
institutions that are by the needs of the implementation of the main duties and functions of each
Ministry / Institution and Local Government, effective government management, and HR
management of the apparatus, as well as a system of supervision and accountability that can
realize a government with high integrity (Zahra, 2019).
In implementing the bureaucratic reform policy, ANRI has established a working group
that focuses on eight areas of change. This working group is part of the bureaucratic reform
team consisting of a steering team, an implementation team, and a working group. The
determination of this bureaucratic reform team has been outlined in the Decree of the Head of
the National Archives of the Republic of Indonesia Number 98 of 2018 concerning the
Bureaucratic Reform Team within the National Archives of the Republic of Indonesia
(National Republic of Indonesia, 2010). The bureaucratic reform team is tasked with
formulating policies and operational strategies for bureaucratic reform in a series of
fundamental reforms and changes to the governance system and implementing them properly.
Based on the results of the bureaucratic reform index in 2019, strengthening the apparatus
resource management system at ANRI experienced an increase in value of 12.29 from the
previous year of 12.28 (Sucipto, 2019). However, there are several programs in strengthening
the apparatus resource management system that are still not fully running, such as only a small
number of work units that apply rewards and punishments based on providing performance