4 GPA points. This fact shows that corruption in Indonesia is a serious problem. Therefore,
this corruption problem must be minimized as effectively and efficiently as possible.
Effectiveness and efficiency in minimizing corruption can presumably be done through
prevention based on local wisdom as an inclusive approach (Mahmudah, 2022; Irawati, 2013).
Inclusivity based on local wisdom as a measure to prevent corruption in Indonesia may
become dialectical of the diverse characteristics of Indonesian localities. Therefore, this paper
uses case studies to uncover the reality of corruption prevention that comes with the basis of
local wisdom in one of the regions in Indonesia. Furthermore, it does not only rely on local
wisdom as an inclusive way of preventing corruption. This study also looks for models of
community participation in the context of preventing courses in daily life. This is considered
important because minimal community involvement and supervision is thought to have
triggered a 25% increase in corruption from village fund corruption in Indonesia (Indonesian,
Corruption Watch, 2019; Research, and Development Centre for Society and Culture, 2020).
Thus, the purpose of this study is to find a model of community participation and the role of
local wisdom in preventing corruption of village funds,
This study chose Sentang Village, Wonogiri District, Wonogiri Regency as a case study.
Sendang Village is the best village in Indonesia for public disclosure information, which
features various village work programs with all budget transparency (Portal Resmi Provinsi
Jawa Tengah, 2021). So that this award and achievement, seem to be enough to represent that
Sendang village deserves to be a case study in its relationship to find "a model of community
participation and the role of local wisdom in preventing corruption of village funds". In more
detail, even Sendang village also has an anti-corruption village program since 2021/2022
(Desa Sendang, 2023). Although the anti-corruption village program has just officially started
in 2022, the starting point as an anti-corruption village is a useful insight into program
evaluation as well as the anti-corruption village model.
The study of anti-corruption literature may not be new, however, most anti-corruption
literature studies focus on anti-corruption education (Wibawa, Agustian, & Warmiyati, 2021;
Suyadi, Waharjani, Sumaryati, Sukmayadi, & Faturahman, 2020). Meanwhile, when
discussing anti-corruption villages, religion is often used as a method of anti-corruption hand
extension (Koeswara, 2023; Suyadi, Waharjani, Sumaryati, Sukmayadi, & Siraj, 2022).
Unlike these studies, this study will focus on finding models of community participation and
the role of local wisdom with Max Weber's social action theory and Mayer N. Zald-John D.
Mc Carthy's resource mobilization theory as its analysis knife. The use of qualitative research
methods and a Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) approach in this study has also increased
the possibility of finding community participation models and the role of local wisdom in
preventing the corruption of village funds. Thus, this study will contribute a new perspective
as well as a framework for local corruption prevention models in Indonesia.
METHOD RESEARCH
This study uses qualitative research methods as the basis for research, to answer the
formulation of community participation models and the role of local wisdom in preventing
corruption of village funds. While PRA is an approach used to map the participation, potential,
and role of local wisdom owned by the people of Sendang village.